By April Gornik
Guest Columnist
North Haven, Long Island, NY, USA
Arcmanoro
Niles received his B.F.A. from the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts and his
M.F.A. from the New York Academy of Art. He has participated in exhibitions at
the David C. Driskell Center (College Park, MD), Long Gallery (New York, NY),
Guild Hall (East Hampton, NY), Flowers Gallery (New York, NY), Shangahi
University (Shangahi, China), and Sophia Wanamaker Gallery (San Jose, Costa
Rica). A recent recipient of the Joan Mitchell Foundation Painters &
Sculptors Grant, he lives and works in Brooklyn. His most recent exhibit was at
Rachel Uffner Gallery (New York, NY), where I visited him for this
Conversation.
APRIL GORNIK: Let’s get right to the orange. It’s such a powerful, unremitting color in your work. I underpaint a lot with reddish colors and sometimes think of it as lifeblood underneath whatever ends up on top of it in the finished work. How do you think of the orange? Where did it come from?
ARCMANORO NILES: I
think of the orange as a color that adds this intensity to these seemingly calm
situations. My paintings have a lot to do with what’s going on underneath the
scene; when a person is just walking down the street, alone, what’s their
story? What’s walking with them? What are they thinking about, worried about,
what’s shaping their decisions…. That’s where the “seekers”
come into play, too. But I didn’t start off thinking of the orange that way. I
was searching for, as contradictory as this sounds, a bright, chromatic color
that was a mid-tone in value. Once I decided I wanted to accentuate the golden
tones, deep reds and purples that I saw in flesh, I was looking for a color
that would support that change in my palette. It wasn’t until after I did the
paintings that I started to see the how the orange heated up these calm
situations.
Arcmanoro Niles |
APRIL GORNIK: You
studied at the New York Academy of Art, with all its strict foundation work. Do
you think it was helpful in how your work has evolved? And has your work grown
out of it, or has it leapt past it?
Stipulations of Love |
APRIL GORNIK: Arc,
you have such powerful, frontal images in your work. Your subjects look right
at the viewer. You’re also a really direct, friendly person. Are your subjects
alter egos, or do you think of them as your family, or a neighborhood, or…? Who
are all these people?
ARCMANORO NILES: Lately,
I’ve been thinking about that a lot. I’m working on some new paintings now
where I go from feeling like it’s a scene I’m
walking into, to feeling like it’s a memory and I’m looking back at myself.
It’s hard for me to separate the subject being other people, as opposed to it
being me, because the situations that I depict come from me trying to
understand how something feels and what may have led a person to live the life
they do. What does it feel like to look in the mirror and realize you’re older
and wonder if you’re not so different from your mom? Or what does it feel like
to be in a relationship and want to connect but don’t know how?
What Time Had Done |
APRIL GORNIK: In spite of the friendliness of your subjects, there are also characters that lurk in the background. We’ve talked about them before as little, or not so little, devilish presences. Can you describe their role in your work? Are they mischief-makers or real threats?
ARCMANORO NILES: I’ve
been calling them Seekers. I wanted to have these impulsive creatures in the
paintings that did whatever was going to make them immediately feel good or
happy. I wanted them to be the opposite of the people in the paintings who
connect and allow themselves to be vulnerable with each other. The Seekers
avoid doing that. The paintings are about coping mechanisms, and I was thinking
about how people deal with trauma no matter how big or small, how it affects
them, do you decide to avoid it or open up and deal with it. So I wanted the
Seekers to be cute and playful, not bad or evil, because I think actions are
often demonized when a person is really just sad or hurting and wants to feel
good. I know my actions have been misinterpreted at times.
The Gift of the Offspring |
APRIL GORNIK: I’m
afraid of knives. Guns and clubs are also scary, of course, but there’s
something about a knife that seems particularly threatening. Some of the
scariest little ghouls in your work are busily cutting things—things that look
flesh-like, and sometimes very phallic—with knives. Who are those ghouls and do
you think of them as threatening, or as just co-existing with everybody else in
your work? Are they in cahoots with the line-drawing spirits (who often look
female, with big boobs)?
ARCMANORO NILES: Yes,
they are in cahoots with the line drawing figures; they are both
Seekers. I wanted to give a physical form to the things I feel influence how
people in my life make decisions and decide to move about the world. I focus on
violence and sex. The little guy with the knife is more destructive; sometimes
he’s cutting into himself. The line figures are more sexual, but both of them
are seeking immediate comfort from what they are feeling. I set out to make
them these little cute guys, but I’m realizing a lot of people find them scary,
probably because they are cute and smiling but appear to be up to
something.
When We Were Young |
APRIL GORNIK: What
does the idea of a playground mean to you? You have a lot of playgrounds in
your work, and kids seem to be sheltering in them. Is that a fair thing to say?
ARCMANORO NILES: Yes,
that is fair to say. I do think of the playground as a shelter and sort of a
classroom. I don’t remember anything I really learned in class when I was in 2nd, 3rd or 4th grade, but I do remember the lessons I learned
on the playground. How to interact with others, what its like to have a crush,
to learn about all the different groups and cliques kids have and how to move
about the world in that context. I feel like those lessons stayed with me and
probably everyone else that was there, and had a big influence on how the rest
of my interactions with people evolved. Looking back it’s so silly – why would
that affect us so much? But back then it was so serious, somewhat dependent on
your economic status. After a certain age serious
things happen on the playground. And that’s true for kids that are well off
too. Things go down on the playground for them also, but just different types
of things.
The Classroom |
APRIL GORNIK: You
just started teaching at Montclair. Are you finding it inspirational,
distracting, fulfilling? All of the above?
ARCMANORO NILES: I
find teaching fulfilling. I learn a lot about myself when I teach, and I’m
always questioning what I tell my students. It makes me question my beliefs and
motives for the things I do in the studio.
APRIL GORNIK: You’re
squarely putting yourself in the great tradition of figurative painters. Who
are some of your art heroes, and why?
The Magic of Youth |
APRIL GORNIK: Glitter.
Honestly, it’s not something I look forward to seeing in painting, and yet
somehow you’ve managed to make it work exceptionally well in your work! How did
it happen that you started using it in the first place?
ARCMANORO NILES: That
decision came out of my training, thinking about Caravaggio, and sort of
conceptualized through Vincent Desiderio. I’m always thinking about light and
the rate of speed with which it bounces back to your eye depending on how it’s
painted, opaque or transparent. I had been thinking about how hair, which was
just a solid orange color in my previous body of work, would look like a
glowing halo at times. I started thinking of what materials I could use to
really have it bounce back to the eye and shimmer. The first thing that came to
mind was gold leaf, a material that has been traditionally used for halos, but
I decided to try glitter because I love color. I never liked glitter in
paintings, but I was very fortunate to have a residency at Guild Hall House in
East Hampton, NY, where they told me I didn’t have to make anything and that no
one had to see it if I did, and that gave me the courage to start experimenting
with glitter.
APRIL GORNIK: Glitter
brings me to the subject of light in your work. In mine, I look for actual
light to play with. You often have multiple light sources, and sometimes people
and buildings have an inner glow, but your light seems to me generally more
like the light in dreams. It’s sometimes rich, sometimes caustic, and somewhat
unnerving. Do you think about light in your work, and if so, how?
When We Played As Kids |
ARCMANORO NILES: I do
think about light a lot, it’s very important to me when I’m making a picture. I
want the light to be embedded in the image, to appear like it’s coming from
within the figurers, like the canvas has a life of its own.
Links: